Limiting Auditors’ Liability
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Limiting Tort Liability for Medical Malpractice
The past few years have seen a sharp increase in premiums for medical malpractice liability insurance, which health care professionals buy to protect themselves from the costs of being sued (see Figure 1 on page 2). On average, premiums for all physicians nationwide rose by 15 percent between 2000 and 2002—nearly twice as fast as total health care spending per person. The increases during that ...
متن کاملHierarchical Analysis of Effective Components on Auditors\' Professional Liability Insurance to Develop Ethical Framework
Background: The development of the insurance industry and the accounting system are two important pillars of economic development of any country and the ethical responsibility of auditors requires them to reduce the risk of their activities. The present study has developed a hierarchical analysis of the components affecting the professional liability insurance of auditors in order to develop th...
متن کاملLimiting Liability in a Federally Compliant File System
1 Policy and Problem Statement Congress has begun to explicitly addressed the importance of maintaining and securing electronic information, be it personal health information, top-secret defense data, or the accounting information of a publicly traded company. There exist over 4,000 local, state and federal acts and regulations with regard to storage, all with a varying range of requirements fo...
متن کاملLimiting Therapist Exposure to Tarasoff Liability Guidelines for Risk Containment
The "duty to protect" third parties, first imposed by the Tarasoff case, has concerned and perplexed clinicians. A series of guidelines is offered for reducing therapist exposure to suit, based on expert witness experience in a number of cases raising this form of tort liability. These guidelines concern the assessment and management of risk, the documentation of information and activities, the...
متن کاملLimiting Respondeat Superior Liability: a Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing?
In this response to Burt Neuborne’s Who’s Afraid of the Human Rights Commission, the author seeks to challenge many of the assumptions underlying Neuborne’s model calling for increased focus on preventative measures by the Human Rights Commission. In Part I, the author addresses Neuborne’s moral arguments and concludes that he undermines the ability of sanctions to deter future conduct. In Part...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Bond Law Review
سال: 1999
ISSN: 2202-4824,1033-4505
DOI: 10.53300/001c.5344